- March
- 13
Sean Avery was fined $2,500 and the Rangers were tabbed for $25,000 as a result of the left wing’s water bottle throwing incident on Sunday. This news came courtesy not of the league or the Rangers, but of Avery himself.
I won’t detail the attire he was sporting when he announced as much. Let’s just say it wasn’t pretty.
In other news, everyone practiced today, although Marek Malik and Paul Mara were each still in non-contact green jerseys. Malik is day-to-day, and Mara said he’s about a week away.
More in a bit, including Jaromir Jagr’s response to Glen Sather’s statement in Prague that he wants to re-sign the captain at season’s end….
Posted by Sam Weinman on Thursday, March 13th, 2008 at 12:37 pm |
|
Email
| 49 Comments »
- March
- 12
Stephen Valiquette said he hasn’t had any discussions with the Rangers about a contract for next season, but that he wants to be back.
Neither of these revelations should come as much of a surprise. One, given the other free agents on the team’s roster, the backup goalie might not be much of a priority right around now. And the team probably already has a good idea that Valiquette isn’t interested in walking away.
Just much does Valiquette like being a Ranger? This is how he described it to me:
“The staff is the best in the league. It’s the best facility. The best plane. The best food on the plane. The best workout facilities. The best coaches. There isn’t one negative aspect of being a New York Ranger. The quality of life is great here.”
In other words, he’s pretty miserable.
Truth is, the Rangers have stumbled on a gem with Valiquette, not only because he’s capable of stealing a game from time-to-time, but because he has no ego to speak of, and is happy to be the starting goalie’s biggest supporter. That’s not a common combination of traits.
And given all that, you wonder if Valiquette’s success opened the door for Al Montoya being shipped out of town. Valiquette shot down that theory when I asked him, and Tom Renney only said the combination of Henrik Lundqvist and Valiquette allowed the team to feel comfortable making the deal.
Obviously. But I would have to think holding on to Montoya would be much more important to the Rangers if Valiquette turned out to be a disappointment this season.
As we know now, though, that hasn’t been the case, and my guess is the Rangers will feature the same goaltending tandem in 2008-09 that they do now. And unlike some of his teammates, Valiquette doesn’t sound like he’s going to push the Rangers too hard when it comes to a new deal.
“No,” he said when I asked him if there’s been any talk so far. “But should I be like Sean Avery and tell you what I think I’m worth?”
Posted by Sam Weinman on Wednesday, March 12th, 2008 at 7:05 pm |
|
Email
| 100 Comments »
- March
- 12
Update, 1:33 p.m: The Rangers just announced they’ve agreed to terms with forward Justin Soryal.
A startling admission: I don’t know who that is. Apparently he’s in the OHL playing for Peterborough, and has 15 goals and 22 assists in 56 games. He was a free agent, so I assume that means he wasn’t drafted. That’s OK, Justin. Neither was I.
It’s never a good reflection on an officiating crew when an infraction that goes unpunished during a game leads to a suspension. That, however, is what happened to Andrew Peters, who was suspended one game for his punch from the bench on Colton Orr on Monday night in Buffalo.Tom Renney didn’t have much to say about the news when asked about it now, and really, what can he say? The Rangers and Sabres are done for the season, and won’t likely meet again until 2008-09. So in other words: a lot of good it does his team now.
Meanwhile, some notes from practice:
Henrik Lundqvist took the day off to recover from his head cold, leaving occasional fill-in Chad Killam of Manhattanville College fame to occupy the other net. There are still two days before the Rangers play in Florida, so Renney said he wasn’t sure what his plans were for Stephen Valiquette. Valiquette when asked said he didn’t know, either, although I wouldn’t be surprised to see the backup start against the Panthers.
Brendan Shanahan also took the day off from practice to rest, although he was working out in the team’s fitness room. Would it be such a bad idea to extend Shanahan’s hiatus into the Florida trip and let Petr Prucha back into the mix? I don’t think so.
Look, these points are crucial as well seeing how the Rangers are now within reach of home-ice advantage. But it’s also time to start thinking about having Shanahan refreshed for the postseason. And to be honest, given Shanahan’s even strength play of late, Prucha wouldn’t be much of a drop-off at all.
Paul Mara (face) and Marek Malik (upper body) also skated but in green no-contact jerseys. Malik is a possibility for the weekend, although the team wanted to see how he felt tomorrow.
More in a bit…
Posted by Sam Weinman on Wednesday, March 12th, 2008 at 11:43 am |
|
Email
| 96 Comments »
- March
- 11
A project for my boss just now involved submitting a list of teams the Rangers might face in the first round of the playoffs.
From what I recall about last year, only sixth through eighth place were viable options at the same point in the season, and I’m pretty sure there were only four realistic first round opponents: Buffalo, New Jersey, Tampa Bay, and Atlanta (where the Rangers ended up going).
This year? There are seven different possible opponents (eight if you count the Sabres three points out of eighth, and 10 if you think Washington or Florida storming back to win the Southeast Division is still a possibility).
Not only that, but there is still the chance the Rangers could claim home-ice advantage, meaning there are something like a thousand different scenarios for where the Rangers would play their first round game and who they’d be playing against.
A couple of reactions to this:
First off, I should reiterate I am really bad at math so I’m pretty sure “a thousand” is probably not accurate.
And secondly, I’m aware that this isn’t something any of you want to discuss right now since it’s woefully premature. But that’s just what I do.
Posted by Sam Weinman on Tuesday, March 11th, 2008 at 1:43 pm |
|
Email
| 115 Comments »
- March
- 11
Not surprisingly given Tom Renney’s admission last night that his team is “spent”, the coach gave the Rangers a day off today. The team certainly earned it in going the distance in these back-to-back wins.
The only minor concern is if they lose momentum before they play next in Florida on Friday. But frankly, that’s a concern whether they practiced today or not.
In other news:
Sounds like Rangers-Bruins is the leader in the clubhouse for the game next winter at Yankee Stadium (yes, that’s a golf metaphor when talking about a hockey game at a baseball stadium. It’s too much!), with one idea being a home-and-home shifting back to Fenway Park. I understand the concern that too many of these games would make the novelty wear off. But I, for one, don’t see once a season as overexposure.
A lot of frustration with the officiating last night, not to mention my failure to address as much in my final post of evening. A couple of points on that: Yes, the officiating was suspect at best, particularly the goaltender interference call on Fred Sjostrom and the non-call on the punch from Andrew Peters on the Sabres bench to Colton Orr. But for one, the Rangers getting the short end of the calls is hardly a new phenomenon. And at that point in the evening, a win and a 13th consecutive point was more noteworthy.
Naturally if the Rangers lose, then the officiating is a huge part of the story.
Finally, here’s the link to my story today on where the Rangers choose to live and why. The story evolved into something different over the past few days, but the interesting part to me is still how the dynamic has shifted over the past few years.
It used to be where almost all of the Rangers lived in Westchester (as a kid growing up in Rye, I saw guys around town all the time), and even as recently as last season, the breakdown of players in Manhattan versus the suburbs was roughly 50-50. Now an unofficial count of the roster has 17 players living in Manhattan and just six out here (Straka, Betts, Orr, Rozsival, Tyutin, and Malik).
This is a reflection of several changes: one, players make more money and they now can afford to live a good life in Manhattan; two, no longer a collection of graybeards, the Rangers actually now have more young single players who want to sample all the city has to offer. And finally, there is the fact that the team trusts players enough to let them live where they want.
Bear in mind, that was actually a concern at one point given the combination of New York’s many distractions and the hockey player’s reputations for cutting loose from time-to-time. This is not to say that players these days are all in bed in time for Jay Leno. The difference now is they may know there’s a lot more at stake.
“I think as I’ve gotten older the younger guys have become more and more responsible each year, and I think it goes back to colleges and juniors, jus being prepared better and knowing everyone’s under a microscope,” said Chris Drury, who while no longer single, lives in Manhattan with his wife and two kids. “It just seems like guys are better equipped to handle it. But any city, if you want trouble you can find it. It may be more in your face in New York, but there’s trouble in every city.”
Anyway, something to chew on while you count down the minutes until Friday…
Posted by Sam Weinman on Tuesday, March 11th, 2008 at 10:11 am |
|
Email
| 57 Comments »
- March
- 10
“This team is in a bad way, folks. There’s no sugarcoating it.”
That was me on Jan. 20, after the Rangers dropped a clunker at home against Boston, and the growing sense was this team was going nowhere in a hurry. Now the point streak is at 13 games after tonight’s shootout win in Buffalo, and the Rangers are tied with Ottawa for fifth place.
This all leads to an important question: Why do I even bother covering this team the first three months of the season?
Look, I will make no proclamations or predictions about what lies ahead. The playoffs are goofy, and the Rangers aren’t even there yet.
But yes, to answer your question, you officially have reason to be excited.
Posted by Sam Weinman on Monday, March 10th, 2008 at 8:51 pm |
|
Email
| 95 Comments »
- March
- 10
While I don’t question the validity of John Dellapina’s story about a Rangers game in the works at Yankee Stadium—despite being a lifelong defenseman, he usually knows what he’s talking about—the official NHL stance on the matter is a tad more tempered.
According to league VP Frank Brown, the Rangers are only “among the many teams that have expressed interest aggressively” about an outdoor game for next season. He also said there’s no time frame for locking down teams or a site for the game.
Naturally, it’s in the league’s best interest to make sure everything is lined up before they announce anything official. But I wouldn’t expect that announcement to be anytime soon.
Posted by Sam Weinman on Monday, March 10th, 2008 at 1:19 pm |
|
Email
| 93 Comments »
- March
- 10
Update, 1:25 p.m.: The King remains on his throne tonight in Buffalo. And a a banged-up Marek Malik is a possible scratch in favor of Jason Strudwick.
Update, 12:05 p.m.: My colleague Peter Abraham, despite being a good friend, has a different opinion. This doesn’t necessarily make him a bad person. Or at least not completely.
There’s also a report from John Dellapina at the News saying the Rangers are close to a deal to play a game at Yankee Stadium next winter.
Bring it on, I say! Peanuts, Cracker Jacks, and HGH for everyone!
Seriously, I’m all for anything that puts hockey on a grander stage, and given my well-documented affection for all things involving outdoor hockey, this would be even better.
The question is who should the opponent be. Does it need to be another New York team? If not, does it have to be an Original Six franchise? I say yes to the latter. Given the rivalry between the Yankees and the Red Sox, Rangers-Bruins at the Stadium would be a welcome new twist.
Posted by Sam Weinman on Monday, March 10th, 2008 at 10:02 am |
|
Email
| 38 Comments »
- March
- 10
What exactly is Jaromir Jagr talking about when he says he has a plan for the future, but doesn’t want to say anything to distract the team?
Is he going to re-sign with the Rangers? Is he going to retire? Is he going to be Barack Obama’s running mate for the Democratic nomination (OK, maybe the whole Czech native thing might get in the way)? It’s all interesting stuff—by way of Larry Brooks—and I’m not sure what to make of it.
Either way, Jagr said he was at peace with his decision and he’s focused on this season. Still, how about a hint?
Posted by Sam Weinman on Monday, March 10th, 2008 at 8:09 am |
|
Email
| 46 Comments »
- March
- 9
Give the Washington Capitals rookie credit: He didn’t just tap a shot into his own goal in today’s NBC matinee. He ripped it!
I say if you’re going to bring your own team’s playoff chances crashing down, do it with authority!
A couple of other thoughts:
What exactly is Ron Duguay wearing? You’re seeing the electric blue suit on TV, but during the period, I’m getting it right in front of me from my seat in the press box. Hey, Ron, Sergeant Pepper called. He wants his jacket back.
A very sluggish start for the Rangers, owing to perhaps a few factors: daylight savings, bad ice, and of course, the fact that they can see Ron Duguay and his jacket standing behind the glass.
More in a bit…
Posted by Sam Weinman on Sunday, March 9th, 2008 at 2:59 pm |
|
Email
| 89 Comments »